A Learning Theory of Ranking Aggregation
نویسندگان
چکیده
Originally formulated in Social Choice theory, Ranking Aggregation, also referred to as Consensus Ranking, has motivated the development of numerous statistical models since the middle of the 20th century. Recently, the analysis of ranking/preference data has been the subject of a renewed interest in machine-learning, boosted by modern applications such as meta-search engines, giving rise to the design of various scalable algorithmic approaches for approximately computing ranking medians, viewed as solutions of a discrete (generally NP-hard) minimization problem. This paper develops a statistical learning theory for ranking aggregation in a general probabilistic setting (avoiding any rigid ranking model assumptions), assessing the generalization ability of empirical ranking medians. Universal rate bounds are established and the situations where convergence occurs at an exponential rate are fully characterized. Minimax lower bounds are also proved, showing that the rate bounds we obtain are optimal.
منابع مشابه
A robust aggregation operator for multi-criteria decision-making method with bipolar fuzzy soft environment
Molodtsov initiated soft set theory that provided a general mathematicalframework for handling with uncertainties in which we encounter the data by affix parameterized factor during the information analysis as differentiated to fuzzy as well as bipolar fuzzy set theory.The main object of this paper is to lay a foundation for providing a new application of bipolar fuzzy soft tool in ...
متن کاملUpper bounds and aggregation in bipartite ranking
One main focus of learning theory is to find optimal rates of convergence. In classification, it is possible to obtain optimal fast rates (faster than n−1/2) in a minimax sense. Moreover, using an aggregation procedure, the algorithms are adaptive to the parameters of the class of distributions. Here, we investigate this issue in the bipartite ranking framework. We design a ranking rule by aggr...
متن کاملThe Lovasz-Bregman Divergence and connections to rank aggregation, clustering, and web ranking
We extend the recently introduced theory of Lovász Bregman (LB) divergences [19] in several ways. We show that they represent a distortion between a “score” and an “ordering”, thus providing a new view of rank aggregation and order based clustering with interesting connections to web ranking. We show how the LB divergences have a number of properties akin to many permutation based metrics, and ...
متن کاملThe Lovász-Bregman Divergence and connections to rank aggregation, clustering, and web ranking: Extended Version
We extend the recently introduced theory of Lovász Bregman (LB) divergences [20] in several ways. We show that they represent a distortion between a “score” and an “ordering”, thus providing a new view of rank aggregation and order based clustering with interesting connections to web ranking. We show how the LB divergences have a number of properties akin to many permutation based metrics, and ...
متن کاملRanking Sports Teams and the Inverse Equal Paths Problem
The problem of rank aggregation has been studied in contexts varying from sports, to multi-criteria decision making, to machine learning, to academic citations, to ranking web pages, and to descriptive decision theory. Rank aggregation is the mapping of inputs that rank subsets of a set of objects into a consistent ranking that represents in some meaningful way the various inputs. In the rankin...
متن کامل